Home News


WQYU – Blog


Who’s pushing the false narrative? Is it the person making the claim of voter fraud or YouTube removing videos claiming voter fraud?


/ March 20, 2026

Hey YouTube, the video that I uploaded that shows the former President of the United States speaking to the American people does not advance false claims of fraud in the 2020 presidential election unless you can show me evidence that says otherwise, however I have evidence that supports there was fraud being committed.

Witnesses testified under the penalty of perjury that the witness fraud being committed.

In Maricopa County officials are refusing to comply with a court order to handover evidence. (Why are officials refusing to comply with a court order to handover evidence?)

At least at one counting center windows were being covered up to prevent the public from witnessing ballots being counted, why would they want to stop the public from seeing ballots being counted? (If you’re doing nothing wrong then you shouldn’t have a problem with the public being able to peek in the windows at a public place.)

Another accounting center the building was evacuated for supposedly a water leak yet as seen on close circuit television you could see a woman sitting at a table pulling out ballots from the box that was placed under the table.

how do you account for dead people casting a ballot?


Why are ballots being transported across state lines by the trucks full?

Ballet harvesting?

The only one who is pushing a false narrative is you, What I uploaded it’s not saying anything that is grossly falsely it is simply the 45th President of the United States making a claim that it was fraud in the election and based on what I have mentioned above supports the theory of fraud being committed especially when witnesses testify under the penalty of perjury. In Maricopa county they are conducting a forensics audit why would officials refuse to comply with a court order to handover evidence to the auditors? Maybe to hide the evidence that it was fraud being committed.

The video should have never been removed off of YouTube, a straight should’ve never been issued but I think the viewer needs to make a decision based on what they find not have a politically biased social media site to decide what happened in our presidential election. Especially when you provide absolutely no evidence that disproves any clients yet there is some evidence that is supporting the claim that it was fraud committed in the presidential 2020 election.




Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




WQYU – Blog Home | Terms of Use